- Tax expenditures are not examined regularly as are direct budget items.
- When there are no sunset dates that would require some discussion on whether the special deduction, exclusion or credit should be renewed, and no special data collected or made available to lawmakers, an element of spending easily continues even if it is not effective.
- "if policymakers, the media, and the general public lack information about tax expenditures, they cannot fully participate in decisions about how to allocate state resources. In fact, in many states the policy debate encompasses little more than half of the state’s total expenditures because expenditures made through the tax code are not part of the conversation."
Some of the improvements the CBPP suggests include:
- Have sunset dates for tax expenditures.
- Create a performance review process for tax expenditures.
- Set a maximum cost for tax expenditures.
- Set accountability measures for taxpayers that claim economic development tax incentives.
These are useful suggestions for states and the public. I think if the public and the press had better information on tax expenditures, more questions would be asked. Tax expenditures can grow with no oversight to catch it. In 2009, some Oregon lawmakers observed that the cost of its roughly 380 tax expenditures was greater than spending on education, health care and public safety combined (8/19/09 post). I think the public would be shocked at that. I think they would also be shocked at the spending on housing and education in the tax law.
I'd like to see a report with the tax expenditures included in the budget by function. So, the tax expenditures for housing would be itemized and included in the budget for the housing agency (such as Health and Human Services Department). Then that should be broken down to show the use of the funds among the income quintile groups.
What do you think?