Included in sales tax reform was base broadening to include some services mostly used by consumers and ones people won't obtain via e-commerce or by traveling out of state (although hair salons were not included in the final legislation, but in the commission recommendations). Instead of lowering the sales tax rate, they kept it where it is (1/4 point lower than Virginia and Maryland) and lowered individual income taxes.
From my original post at SalesTaxSupport.com, which shut down in 2018.
In May 2014, the D.C.
Tax Revision Commission released its report outlining numerous changes for its key taxes.
Included in the sales tax recommendations:
·
Expand the base to
include more services with a focus on those that are mostly used by consumers
and are not easy to obtain outside of the DC area or online, such as health
clubs and car washes.
·
Add a use tax line to
the personal income tax form (like many states already do).
·
Raise the rate from
5.75% to 6% (to match the rate in neighboring Virginia and Maryland).
There were also
specific sales tax changes not recommended:
·
Increasing the tax
rate on parking, hotels and meals.
·
Expanding the base to
include more goods, such as snacks (deemed "not worth the administrative
challenges" doing so would create).
·
Adding an
"Amazon" or affiliate nexus provision.
That was May. In July,
passage of DC's Fiscal Year 2015 budget included several of the changes
including expanding the base to include the following services, effective
October 1, 2014 (OTR Notice: 2014-09; 8/29/14):
·
Bottled water delivery
·
Bowling alley and
billiard parlor
·
Car washing
·
Carpet and upholstery
cleaning
·
Health club (stories
in the press referred to this as the "yoga tax" (see, for example,
the Washington Post, 6/24/14))
·
Storage of household
goods
·
Tanning
A service mentioned by
the reform commission, but not included in the legislation is beautician
services. That seems odd given that most people won't travel too far to get a
hair cut.
Is DC's base
broadening to include some services good tax policy? I say yes. Consider the
following:
·
Administration and
compliance - most of the newly taxed services are offered by businesses that
also sell tangible personal property so they are already complying with the
sales tax law. Expanding the base to include services should make it all easier
- just charge sales tax on the entire amount charged to the customer.
·
Simplicity - while
most of the services are clear - tanning and bowling for example, that is not
true for storage of household goods. How does the owner of a storage facility
know what you are storing? There might also be some evasion if some
people run the cost of storage of personal items through a business they
own.
·
Equity - broadening
the base of a consumption tax beyond tangible personal property will make the
tax more equitable. For example, why must you pay sales tax on an exercise
video or stationary bike, but not on an exercise class or gym membership?
Yet, lowering the rate while broadening the base would be more equitable (DC
kept the rate the same). The DC legislation uses some of the new tax dollars to
reduce the individual income tax. I think it would be better to reduce the
sales tax given that it is the regressive tax. Or perhaps they could have done
both.
DC also did something
we don't see too often. A tax reform commission was formed, it studied
the issues, made recommendations and issued a report. Then, it was acted upon
rather than just put on a shelf to collect dust! Impressive! The report includes other tax changes and the rationale -
it's a good read.
What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment