Well, on October 10, 2015, California Governor Brown, said "NO" to nine tax bills presented to him.
His reason was that they might bust the budget given other budget issues. Each of the nine would have either added or expanded an existing or expired provision or added something new.
One additional benefit beyond curtailing complexity is that perhaps his action will remind lawmakers and taxpayers that another type of tax legislation are bills that reduce or eliminate tax deductions, exclusions, or credits and lower tax rates. Such proposals also help a tax system to be more equitable, simple, efficient and neutral!
What happened - On 10/10/15, Governor Brown vetoed nine bills that either created or expanded a tax credit or exclusion or exemption. He stated that the budget is only “precariously balanced” and that “without the extension of the managed care organization tax” that he “called for in special session, next year’s budget faces the prospect of over $1 billion in cuts.” Thus, he vetoed the nine bills which he noted would make it more difficult to balance the budget. Per Governor Brown: “Tax credits, like new spending on programs, need to be considered comprehensively as part of the budget deliberations.” [That's also something we don't hear lawmakers say often enough!]
The nine bills:
How Often Do California Governors Say No? The California Senate Office of Research updated an earlier report summarizing how often in the past California governors have vetoed legislation. Per this report dated 10/12/15, as of that date, Governor Brown has vetoed 14.13% of bills. This doesn’t surpass his 2011 record of 14.37% though. In the past five years, the governor has vetoed almost 13% of the 4,777 bills presented to him. The record of vetoes is held by Governor Deukmejian who vetoed 2,298 bills during his eight years in office. The report has data back to 1967.
What do you think?