A broader base will also allow for a lower tax rate.
A review of a few
recent sales tax advisory opinions issued by the New York State Department of
Taxation and Finance, remind us of the complexities of sales tax exemptions and
special definitions of taxed items. This is an issue in most states with a
sales tax. For example, you likely have heard of recent issues as to whether
hot coffee to go is subject to sale tax, and litigation on this issue in some
states. New York makes its advisory opinions easily accessible on its website which makes it easy to "pick" on New
York as an example of sales tax complexity. New York also taxes more than
tangible personal property which increases the likelihood of tax base
questions. For example, New York taxes furnishing of information and some
services.
Following are brief
summaries of four rulings issued in April and May 2016.
·
TSB-A-16(13)S (4/26/16) - Sales tax applies to
taxpayer's fees charged for high intensity interval training fitness classes,
as well as fees to enter weight loss challenges, offered at facilities in NYC.
While the taxpayer is not selling taxable dues or membership fees to an
athletic club or taxable personal training servicfes, it is selling services of
a weight control or health salon which is taxable in NYC.
·
TSB-A-16(14)S (4/27/16) - Sales tax applies to cookies
sold in any of three ways: (1) for immediate consumption, (2) in to-go boxes
holding rout to a few dozen cookies, and (3) cookies to be delivered.
"Whether Petitioner sells cookies in small quantities in its stores, in
larger quantities in to-go boxes or delivers cookies to customers, the cookies
are always sold in a heated state. Thus, pursuant to Tax Law § 1105(d) and 20
NYCRR § 527.8, Petitioner’s receipts from the sales of cookies are taxable,
whether sold for on-premises or off-premises consumption."
·
TSB-A-16(19)S (5/20/16) - Data storage services found
not subject to sales tax. This is not the sale of software or an information
service or storage of tangible personal property. Thus, it doesn't fall under
the taxing statute.
·
TSB-A-16(17)S (5/2/16) - This involves an uncommon
fact pattern. A Florida LLC entered a purchase agreement with a New York art
dealer to purchase a sculpture being created in Germany. Taxpayer also entered
an agreement with a NYC museum, an exempt taxpayer, to display the sculpture and
arrange for its transportation from Germany. The museum would cover
transportation and insurance. While that constitutes consideration to the
taxpayer, no sales tax was owed becuase the taxpayer is a nonresident and the
museum has an exempt organization certificate. Also, taxpayer took possession
of the sculpture in Germany so there was no transfer in New York.
This is just a few of
the rulings released in April and May involving sales tax. These rulings
indicate that the New York sales tax law does not meet the certainty or
simplity principles of good tax
policy. Clearly, the
taxpayers asked for rulings because the law was not clear. Each ruling involved
a few statutory definitional provisions where it was not obvious how they
applied.
A possible solution to
the certainty and complexity issues is to follow an approach more common to
VAT. Apply sales
tax to every transaction where some type of compensation is received from a
customer for the acquisition of goods or services, as broadly defined. If
the buyer is a business, when they file their sales tax form, they also list
the sales tax they paid and it offsets the sales tax the business collected.
The difference is submitted to the government. If the business paid more sales
tax than it collected, the government sends a refund of the difference.
The law would be
easier to apply because no definitions would be needed for the sales tax base
because everything sold would be taxed. Rules would be needed to define
business and business use, sourcing (to determine, for example, where the sale
of the sculpture took place), and administrative/compliance procedures. Also,
the base would be broader than we have today enabling states to lower their
sales tax rate making the tax less regressive.
What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment