UPDATE: On 11/2/17, the House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady released H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. I'll have a new post on key points of this soon. I'll also mention some of its key points in my Federal Tax Update at the start of CalCPA's Federal, State, Local & International Taxation Conference on 11/15/17 (the conference runs 11/15 to 11/17) in Universal City.
Feature
|
Observations
|
9-page framework
|
Lots of details are missing
such as where rate brackets start and end, rate on investment income, and
what “loopholes” will be closed.
|
Standard deduction of $24K for
MFJ and $12K for single
|
Will the head-of-household
filing status continue?
Personal and dependency
exemptions are removed.
The stated deductions are almost double the current amounts.
|
Individual rates: 12%, 25% and
35% and perhaps a rate above that for high income individuals for
progressivity.
|
Today, lowest bracket is 10%
and highest is 39.6%.
Will there be a special rate
for investment income, including today’s 0% rate that applies to some capital
gains?
Where will these brackets
start and end?
|
Child Tax Credit – phase-out
limits increased; first $1K is refundable.
Non-refundable credit of $500
for non-child dependents.
|
Today, CTC only applies to
children under age 17 while dependency might go up to age 23 (full-time
student).
If all workers are to get a
higher paycheck and today about 45% of individuals pay no income tax due to
low income, even if they get a higher refundable child credit, it won’t
affect their paycheck.
With this change and repeal of the dependency exemption, employers likely will need to get new W-4 forms from employees (and IRS needs to create the new W-4 form). |
Only itemized deduction for
home ownership and charitable contributions remain.
|
Repeal of state tax deduction
can result in tax increase for many taxpayers.
Repeal of medical expense and
casualty loss might adversely taxpayer’s ability to pay.
|
Preferences “that encourage
work, higher education and retirement security” are retained.
|
No details provided. Is the
preference that encourages work the EITC? Will education provisions and
retirement plan options be streamlined and simplified?
|
Individual and corporate AMT
repealed.
|
What happens to any minimum
tax credit a taxpayer is carrying forward at date of enactment?
|
Repeal of other provisions.
|
What might this include?
|
Repeals estate and GST taxes.
|
What happens to basis of
assets at date of death?
Will the gift tax remain?
|
Corporate rate is 20%.
|
Per the framework, the average
corporate rate among industrialized countries is 22.5%.
|
The rate for “business income
of small and family-owned businesses is 25%. There will be measures to
“prevent recharacterization of personal income into business income.
|
Assuming there are rate cuts,
less than 5% of owners would possibly even be in a rate above 25% (although many in this group have significant income). There are
still payroll tax considerations and make it important that all non-C
corporation owners distinguish services income from return on capital
invested in the business.
|
Double taxation of corporate
income might be addressed.
|
Senator Hatch has discussed
corporate integration via a dividends paid deduction approach with
withholding.
|
Expensing of new investments
in depreciable assets other than structures, made after 9/27/17 will be
expensed, at least for the first five years.
|
This is the only mention of a
date in the framework. Will it include expensing of intangibles as well? New
or also used property? Why five years only? What happens after that? The five
years is likely due to the need to keep the bill revenue neutral by year 11
due to the budget reconciliation. Will temporary rather than permanent
expensing adversely affect the economic growth projections? The Tax
Foundation says yes (Pomerleau, “Economic
and Budgetary Impact of Temporary Expensing,” 10/4/17).
|
Net interest expense of C
corporations is “partially limited” and a similar treatment for other entities
will be considered.
|
There are likely two
rationales for limiting the interest expense deductions: (1) a revenue
raiser, and (2) if assets are expensed and debt-financed, the effective tax
rate is very low, perhaps even zero or negative; thus warranting a limitation
on the interest expense.
|
§199 manufacturing deduction
will be repealed.
|
No surprise here as this
measure (199) is really just a rate cut for many taxpayers, but added complexity. However, it is only available for domestic manufacturers.
|
Various unnamed tax
preferences will be repealed or cut back. Only the research and low-income
housing credits will remain.
|
The rationale for keeping the
research credit is likely because other countries with a lower tax rate also
have research incentives. Also, this credit exists not only for its incentive
effect, but also to address the spillover effects when a company engages in
R&D but others benefit from it as well.
|
Changes will be made to tax
rules for specific industries to “better reflect economic reality” and reduce
tax avoidance.
|
No examples are provided.
|
For businesses, worldwide
taxation will be replaced with territorial with a 100% exemption for
dividends from foreign subs (if the U.S. parent owns at least 10%).
Transition rules will include deemed repatriation with a rate lower for
illiquid assets than for cash and cash equivalents. Payment will be spread
over several years. To prevent shifting certain income to tax havens, there
will be a reduced tax rate on the foreign profits of U.S. multi-national
companies
|
Many details are missing here
including the deemed repatriation tax rate, the period for paying the tax,
and what other rules will need to change due to the shift from a worldwide tax
system.
|
The plan also states President Trump’s President Trump’s Four Principles of Tax Reform:
1.
Simple, fair, easy to understand
2.
Give American works a pay raise.
3.
Make America a jobs market of the world
4.
Bring back trillions of dollars of unrepatriated
earnings.
What do you think?
1 comment:
I have to admit overall I'm not a fan of the currently proposed tax reform. I appreciate your analysis.
Post a Comment