Search This Blog

Showing posts with label loopholes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label loopholes. Show all posts

Sunday, May 22, 2022

Example of how exceptions to rules can create loopholes

A10093, Middle Class Tax Relief, introduced in New York on April 29, 2022, provides tax relief by removing overtime pay and tips from AGI. Overtime is working beyond 40 hours per week and likely means hourly workers rather than salaried ones. 

While the intent might be good if aiming to help people who are seeking jobs with overtime to earn extra money to make ends meet, the reach (and the drop in tax revenue to the state) will be much broader than this. 

The "justification" from the bill sponsor: "With inflation on the rise. The Middle Class is struggling. This Legislation would help lighten the load on Middle class families by suspending all sales tax on non exempt food items, no income tax on any work beyond a 41 hour work week and no tax on any tippable wages."  (there doesn't seem to be any sales tax aspect to A10093 though)

While aimed at the "middle class" there is no definition offered of that. This bill seems to help a high income earner working overtime or receiving tips for services rendered. Some employers might try to change some of a worker's salary to tips (with customer assistance) to help their employees get a tax break (if this were to be enacted, which seems unlikely).

What would be better? Use existing rules, such as increasing the state's earned income tax credit. That would help the group this sponsor seems to want to assist. Or reduce the tax rates for lower income taxpayers.

And think of the compliance issues that would accompany carrying out this proposal? Forms W-2 for New York would need to be modified or have an attachment that goes to the worker and the state showing how much overtime and tip income was earned.

So, a few principles of good tax policy are not satisfied here including equity, simplicity and transparency.

What do you think?


Thursday, March 3, 2016

What's a Loophole?

I forgot to blog on this earlier, after Congress wrote it back in October as part of Public Law 114-74 (11/2/15), the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. While primarily a budget bill, it includes a few tax changes tucked in to raise some revenue. Most notable are the significant changes to how partnerships will be audited in the future. But also tucked in, with no committee discussion that I'm aware of, were changes to Social Security benefits, such as the procedure to file and suspend while a spouse claims spousal benefits on the suspended account. Meanwhile, both spouses Social Security accounts continue to grow. If it applies to a couple, they can easily get a few extra tens of thousands of dollars of benefits. (There were a few other changes to Social Security benefits as well.)

But one overlooked part of the drafting of the part of the legislation with the Social Security changes is the section title:

SEC. 831. CLOSURE OF UNINTENDED LOOPHOLES

So, it appears that some loopholes are intended!

What do you think?


For more on the Social Security changes: (note that if you'll be 66 by the end of April 2016, there may still be an opportunity for you to use the unintended loophole)

For more about what is a loophole - see a 2008 op ed of mine from the San Diego Union-Tribune.